9/5/2023 0 Comments Marked safe![]() “It’s super manipulative, and I knew it, but felt the need to go through with it anyway.” “London is huge so I thought it was very unlikely but then Facebook freaks you out with those ‘not confirmed safe’ statuses,” he wrote to me on Messenger after I’d got in touch to tell him I was OK. Their friends were probably compelled to enquire after Facebook chose to turn on Safety Check, the action sowing a seed of doubt. But Facebook friends who don’t commute to London at all, only visiting the city and “checking in” to different locations from time to time, had also marked themselves as safe, some after friends had requested them to do so. This is especially the case for places such as Westminster or the City of London, which ebb and flow with the tide of civil servants or bankers each day. In some ways, of course, it makes sense: since the Victorian railway boom, the south-east’s growing army of commuters have come to rely on London as a place to work but not necessarily live. Such an area is more suited to be “affected” by a thermonuclear weapon than such a crude attack in Westminster. On the mobile version of Facebook’s Safety Check page, the “affected area” shows a map encompassing as far north as Watford, Hertfordshire, as far west as Slough, Berkshire and as far east as Basildon, Essex. ![]() But the inevitable dichotomy this process creates – if you are in London during such a catastrophe, you are presumed unsafe until you have checked in as safe – is hopelessly inadequate in a city where 8.7 million people live.įacebook has turned on its safety check for the attack in Westminster /R8EfHdvsrH- Elena Cresci March 22, 2017 Safety Check works in a fairly simple way: “If you’re in the affected area, you can tell your friends you’re safe and check to see if they’re safe, too,” the company says. But it probably doesn’t seem quite so silly to people’s friends in New Zealand or Nigeria, who might not be so up to speed. The notion that these London-based friends were somehow in peril from an attack that was neutralised many hours ago seemed absurd to me in London. There I was met with an atypical request: a friend who lives an eight-hour flight away in Canada had asked me to mark myself “safe”.Ĭlicking on the notification took me to Facebook’s Safety Check page, which revealed that 31 of my friends were marked as safe, and 249 of my friends were “not marked as safe”. Set the policy value for Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components -> Internet Explorer -> Internet Control Panel -> Security Page -> Restricted Sites Zone -> 'Script ActiveX controls marked safe for scripting' to 'Enabled', and select 'Disable' from the drop-down box.T his morning, after reading the latest news updates about the terror attack on Westminster, I fired up Facebook. Procedure: Use the Windows Registry Editor to navigate to the following key: HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\Zones\4 Criteria: If the value "1405" is REG_DWORD = 3, this is not a finding. The policy value for Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components -> Internet Explorer -> Internet Control Panel -> Security Page -> Restricted Sites Zone -> 'Script ActiveX controls marked safe for scripting' must be 'Enabled', and 'Disable' selected from the drop-down box. Microsoft Internet Explorer 11 Security Technical Implementation Guide Although this is not a complete security measure for a control to be marked safe for scripting, if a control is not marked safe, it should not be initialized and executed. ![]() ActiveX controls not marked as safe for scripting should not be executed. If you enable this policy setting, script interaction can occur automatically without user intervention. This policy setting allows management of whether ActiveX controls marked safe for scripting can interact with a script.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |